User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

Posted Sep 24, 2009 8:08 UTC (Thu) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
In reply to: AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack by arjan
Parent article: AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

"It's" → "Its". Sigh.


(Log in to post comments)

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

Posted Sep 25, 2009 2:29 UTC (Fri) by knobunc (subscriber, #4678) [Link]

In the topic title? No... it's is correct. "It's" is a contraction of "it is", so since the topic is "AppArmor: it is baaaaaaaack" that is correct. "Its" is possessive, so would mean the article was about the back of AppArmor.

-ben

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

Posted Sep 25, 2009 3:34 UTC (Fri) by smurf (subscriber, #17840) [Link]

No, not in the title -- sorry, should have clarified that.

The error is in the sentence "It's pathname-based approach …".

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

Posted Sep 25, 2009 13:24 UTC (Fri) by knobunc (subscriber, #4678) [Link]

Ah. Sorry!!


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds