User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

Posted Sep 24, 2009 6:43 UTC (Thu) by arjan (subscriber, #36785)
Parent article: AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

you should have know.
the yearly apparmor-to-lkml posting tends to be 3 weeks before kernel summit...

the conspiracy theorist in me says that this is on purpose to be able to claim at KS that they are relevant. But that's of course bogus, there must be some other argument ;-)


(Log in to post comments)

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

Posted Sep 24, 2009 8:08 UTC (Thu) by smurf (subscriber, #17840) [Link]

"It's" → "Its". Sigh.

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

Posted Sep 25, 2009 2:29 UTC (Fri) by knobunc (subscriber, #4678) [Link]

In the topic title? No... it's is correct. "It's" is a contraction of "it is", so since the topic is "AppArmor: it is baaaaaaaack" that is correct. "Its" is possessive, so would mean the article was about the back of AppArmor.

-ben

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

Posted Sep 25, 2009 3:34 UTC (Fri) by smurf (subscriber, #17840) [Link]

No, not in the title -- sorry, should have clarified that.

The error is in the sentence "It's pathname-based approach …".

AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack

Posted Sep 25, 2009 13:24 UTC (Fri) by knobunc (subscriber, #4678) [Link]

Ah. Sorry!!


Copyright © 2018, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds