Blocks in C, not C++
Posted Sep 16, 2009 21:36 UTC (Wed) by elanthis (guest, #6227)
Posted Sep 16, 2009 22:39 UTC (Wed) by ncm (subscriber, #165)
Posted Sep 17, 2009 17:17 UTC (Thu) by cry_regarder (subscriber, #50545)
NOT "C++0xA". The "x" is a wild card which under normal expectations would be replaced with an element of [0-9]. The joke is that since "C++0x" is taking so long. We (they) will keep the implied promise of a first decade delivery by extending the membership of the wildcard to [0-F] (hex).
That means that if you replace the "x" with an "A", you write it as "C++0A" not as "C++0xA"!.
In any case (as pointed out elsewhere), the name is not the real name for the language. It is a joke. The "official" non-real name will surely be of the form "C++1x".
next C++ standard
Posted Sep 17, 2009 19:17 UTC (Thu) by man_ls (guest, #15091)
Posted Sep 18, 2009 11:41 UTC (Fri) by liljencrantz (guest, #28458)
Posted Sep 27, 2009 22:23 UTC (Sun) by engla (guest, #47454)
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds