|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

Posted Sep 10, 2009 5:18 UTC (Thu) by jamesh (guest, #1159)
In reply to: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements by russell
Parent article: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

In the pipe test, neither process is going to be able to fill the pipe buffer. Each process blocks on the other doing alternating reads and writes on the pipes with pretty much no work in between.

I guess it is possible that a scheduler could preempt the task between when the read returns and before it performs the write, but that seems unlikely.

My intuition is that performance would primarily depend on how quickly the scheduler gets round to run a process when it becomes unblocked, which is essentially a measure of average scheduling latency (and as I said before, this doesn't tell you much about the variance in that latency).


to post comments


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds