User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Journaling no protection against power drop

Journaling no protection against power drop

Posted Sep 1, 2009 17:20 UTC (Tue) by markusle (guest, #55459)
In reply to: Journaling no protection against power drop by ncm
Parent article: Ext3 and RAID: silent data killers?

> Some drives only report blocks written to the platter after they really
> have been, but that's bad for benchmarks, so most drives fake it,
> particularly when they detect benchmark-like behavior.

I'd be very interested in some additional references or a list of drives
that do or don't do this.


(Log in to post comments)

Journaling no protection against power drop

Posted Sep 1, 2009 17:44 UTC (Tue) by ncm (subscriber, #165) [Link]

Start by looking at very, very expensive, slow drives. Then forget about them. Instead, rely on redundancy and battery backup. There are lots of companies that aggregate cheap disks, batteries, cache, and power in a nice box, and each charges what they can get for it. Some work well, others less so. Disk arrays work like insurance: spread the risk, and cover for failures. Where they inadvertently concentrate risk, you get it all.

The storage industry is as mature as any part of the computer business. It is arranged such as to allow you to spend as much money as you like, and can happily absorb as much as you throw at it. If you know what you're doing, you can get full value for your money. If you don't know what you're doing, you can spend just as much and get little more value than the raw disks in the box. There is no substitute for competence.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds