|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

no gnu

no gnu

Posted Aug 21, 2009 21:49 UTC (Fri) by juriise (guest, #38305)
In reply to: no gnu by bronson
Parent article: 40 years of Unix (BBC)

"Not sure what you're arguing for or against."

I am arguing for the importance of GNU, and that it is OK to call it the GNU system, when I want to point to the freedom aspect of the system.

"I've never met a Linux dev that thinks "only the kernel is important." Have you?"

I have heard that Linux is the most important part, that calling it the GNU/Linux system is taking credit wrongly, that free software is the old name for open source, they provided the compiler and the toolchain (thats it)...

I think that the biggest contribution from the GNU side is the definition of free software, the licenses, the persistent marketing. They also made some software.


to post comments


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds