Google's Chromium sandbox
Google's Chromium sandbox
Posted Aug 19, 2009 22:03 UTC (Wed) by agl (guest, #4541)In reply to: Google's Chromium sandbox by kjp
Parent article: Google's Chromium sandbox
I didn't consider it, but I believe that using CPU for protection (ring 1/2)
would require changes in the kernel. The beauty of seccomp is that it's been
in the kernel for several years now and is quite widely deployed.
would require changes in the kernel. The beauty of seccomp is that it's been
in the kernel for several years now and is quite widely deployed.
Also, you're correct that all network IO runs in the main browser process.
This is actually a little unfortunate: it would be best to have a separate,
sandboxed process for that but, alas, that's only a wishlist item for now.
