|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

No, it's the readers at fault, not the writer

No, it's the readers at fault, not the writer

Posted Aug 5, 2009 2:35 UTC (Wed) by corbet (editor, #1)
In reply to: No, it's the readers at fault, not the writer by felixfix
Parent article: CentOS turbulence and enterprise Linux tradeoffs

Perhaps I have touched a couple of sensitive toes, but I also really hesitate at calling LWN subscribers "dumb." The joy of writing for this readership is that you all are anything but that. There's been enough unhappiness about this article that I don't think I can write it off as reader dumbness, unfortunately. I don't plan to dumb things down by any stretch, but it's worth trying to understand what happens when I go wrong.

That said, I still don't understand what constitutes "FUD" in this article...


to post comments

No, it's the readers at fault, not the writer

Posted Aug 6, 2009 14:47 UTC (Thu) by liljencrantz (guest, #28458) [Link]

I find your attitude laudable. I don't find the reporting in this particular article biased or inaccurate, but I am not that informed on the subject, so I wouldn't really know. But your willingness to accept errors on your will definitely help keep you accurate and respected in the future.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds