User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

A tempest in a tty pot

A tempest in a tty pot

Posted Jul 29, 2009 16:36 UTC (Wed) by Baylink (guest, #755)
Parent article: A tempest in a tty pot

With all due respect to Linus, I don't think it's the tty layer that claimed this victim... I think it's Linus.

Sure, this is the NFL, wear your pads, and all that crap.

As several people just pointed out to me, rather strenuously, in the sexism thread, that's really not a good enough answer. My experience of Alan is not that he's a shrinking violet; perhaps Linus could have approached that in a... slightly more mellow fashion?

I happen to be on the "if there's really a 'right' way for the kernel to do it, and that breaks user apps that made questionable assumptions, then break them" side, myself, but I don't think it's black and white, either.

Particularly in this case, where the odds of that kernel getting into distributions are effectively non-existent, I don't think this was resolved in the best way for all concerned. Though perhaps that observation is obvious enough to be puerile...


(Log in to post comments)

A tempest in a tty pot

Posted Jul 29, 2009 20:33 UTC (Wed) by AlexHudson (guest, #41828) [Link]

I think you're basically right.

In other areas of the kernel you wouldn't notice - people have thrown up their hands in places like IDE even after substantial work, it gets chucked out, and other people willingly step up.

It means that there is really very little compelling reason to 'play nice'. Until it comes to keeping the completer-finisher types for places like tty...


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds