User: Password:
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Canonical? No.

Canonical? No.

Posted Jun 29, 2009 20:17 UTC (Mon) by job (guest, #670)
In reply to: Canonical? No. by asdlfiui788b
Parent article: Developer statistics for 2.6.30

You mean they lose money on it. :)

I will save any judgement on Canonical or any other company until they have black figures. Until then, the process is not yet sustainable and matters little in the long run.

(Log in to post comments)

Canonical? No.

Posted Aug 12, 2009 19:22 UTC (Wed) by snadrus (guest, #60224) [Link]

Important point!
If [their organization cannot persist (which is true if they live in the red)] then
anyone requesting more from them could at-best see short-term benefits until they run out of cash reserves.

They've enhanced the open source desktop with Upstart & invited more independent developers to open source with Quickly and Launchpad.

Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds