Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck for mainline
[Posted June 17, 2009 by jake]
| From: |
| Linus Torvalds <torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org> |
| To: |
| Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-AT-gmail.com> |
| Subject: |
| Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck for mainline |
| Date: |
| Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT) |
| Message-ID: |
| <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906120933120.3237@localhost.localdomain> |
| Cc: |
| Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-elte.hu>, Pekka Enberg <penberg-AT-cs.helsinki.fi>,
Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org> |
| Archive‑link: | |
Article |
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>
> Please consider pulling the kmemcheck tree;
No.
This seems to be 99% merges o fother branches.
I'm no longer pulling from people who can't keep their branches clean and
develop without pulling from me every other day, or pulling from other
random branches. If it gets that many conflicts, I just don't want to see
it - there's something seriously wrong with it.
And if you just merge for some random reason, I don't want to pull it
either.
So in either case, I'm not pulling this.
Just _look_ at that gitk thing. It has several stretches of just "Merge
branch 'linus' into kmemcheck". WITH NO OTHER DEVELOPMENT IN BETWEEN!
This release, I'm only going to pull trees that don't do crazy shit.
Linus
