User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Canonical?

Canonical?

Posted May 30, 2009 10:06 UTC (Sat) by kragil (guest, #34373)
In reply to: Canonical? by mikov
Parent article: Developer statistics for 2.6.30

Canonical employs a few very capable kernel hackers. Sure they don't contribute as much as the RH or Novell guys, but maybe that it because their time is spent providing high quality kernel support. Think about it ;)


(Log in to post comments)

Canonical?

Posted May 30, 2009 22:19 UTC (Sat) by mikov (subscriber, #33179) [Link]

If they provide kernel support, wouldn't it result in patches, which then would have to visible in the above statistics?

(BTW, I want to reiterate that I have nothing against Canonical, and in fact at one time our company was considering purchasing support. Alas, instead there was a company-wide downgrade from Kubuntu to Windows XP for all non-developers. That however is a different subject...)

Canonical?

Posted Jun 1, 2009 5:50 UTC (Mon) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]

Support can either mean hand holding (ie) do foo to accomplish bar or it can be mean prioritized bug fixes or new features and if it is the latter and the vendor is pushing those fixes upstream, then it would show up in these statistics.

Canonical?

Posted Jun 10, 2009 19:25 UTC (Wed) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263) [Link]

Well handholding seems scarce if I have to look at some Launchpad projects, so there is not much left.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds