|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Ex-Microsoftie: Free Software Will Kill Redmond (ComputerWorld)

Ex-Microsoftie: Free Software Will Kill Redmond (ComputerWorld)

Posted May 24, 2009 10:32 UTC (Sun) by tdz (subscriber, #58733)
In reply to: Ex-Microsoftie: Free Software Will Kill Redmond (ComputerWorld) by KevinSB
Parent article: Ex-Microsoftie: Free Software Will Kill Redmond (ComputerWorld)

Before commenting, I think you should really look into the book, if you havn't done so. Quoting from page 170:

> In addition to knowing what memory is in use, a GC system knows
> the size of every buffer, and so can validate all reads and writes to
> memory.

Wrong, but the book is full of such statements. This concrete chapter is about reliability, but even for systems which do the described boundary checking, Mr. Curtis doesn't say how this helps building more reliable applications (not to speak of operating systems).

The author demonstrates that he has only a vague understanding of what garbage collection means, what it can do, and what it can _not_ do.

Regarding politics he writes on page 266:

> This book is about free software, but I'd like to end with a few
> words on a free press, free markets and a few other issues.
> [...]
> Reviewers told me that this material belongs in another book, but
> the problem is that everything here has already been written — it
> just hasn't been read and accepted yet! If we knowledge technolo-
> gists are to become the dominant political force, then there are a
> few things I think we should understand.

For the rest of the chapter he pushes his hardcore-conservative opinions.

Whatever you think of his opinion, I hope you agree with me that the Free-Software movement is not primarily a political one. Given that, I hope you also agree that politics do not belong into such a book, as long as they do not relate to Free Software directly.

Regards


to post comments

Ex-Microsoftie: Free Software Will Kill Redmond (ComputerWorld)

Posted May 24, 2009 11:48 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

"If we knowledge technologists are to become the dominant political
force", wow. I thought I knew some egotists but that is just stunning. Of
*course* computing is more important than everything else humanity does so
it deserves to be 'dominant', except for the water and power grids oh and
I suppose we need food and transport would be nice and the communications
infrastructure isn't 'knowledge' either and so on...

This guy has definitely been drinking the Kurzweil kool-aid.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds