User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Shell and Zeitgeist: the future of GNOME?

Shell and Zeitgeist: the future of GNOME?

Posted Apr 30, 2009 15:14 UTC (Thu) by rlk (guest, #47505)
Parent article: Shell and Zeitgeist: the future of GNOME?

GNOME Shell looks like a serious step backwards. I hate to say "as usual", but while GNOME 1.x was quite usable, it's gone downhill from there.

The notion of one active application at a time that's on top is completely wrong, at least for me. Call it what you will, but I've always preferred the freewheeling focus strictly follows mouse, no autoraise, no click to raise style. I often have a big jumble of windows on my screen, and if I get too annoyed I shuffle some of them off to other virtual desktops, but it's how I like to work. I have a big screen (WUXGA), and I'd prefer to move in the direction of a bigger screen (QXGA or whatnot).

I remember all too well using Pagemaker on Windows 3.11. Copying anything between documents was really unpleasant. It would be that much worse if only one window at a time were maximized. Sometimes it's really important to have multiple things at once visible -- I'm working on a Python script and need to see on the fly how changes to the script affect behavior.


(Log in to post comments)

Shell and Zeitgeist: the future of GNOME?

Posted Apr 30, 2009 17:32 UTC (Thu) by Frej (subscriber, #4165) [Link]

>The notion of one active application at a time that's on top...

Gnome-shell shell doesn't do that.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds