McDonalds coffee case [OT]
McDonalds coffee case [OT]
Posted May 20, 2003 18:18 UTC (Tue) by Ray (guest, #11342)In reply to: I think SCO is not interested in protecting their code. by Wol
Parent article: Torvalds Suggests DiBona for SCO Panel (Linux Journal)
You don't need to rely on rumors, the details of the case are readily available via google. The woman got thrid degree burns, was in physical therapy for eight weeks, and in the end was paid less than the cost of her medical bills. Search on 'superheated mcdonalds coffee' to pull up a number of links on the case.
And, one of the primary points leading to the verdict hinged on the fact that McDonalds had roughly 700 prior cases of injury due to coffee, and did nothing about it. That changes it from an accident, to willfull negligence.
