MS gain FUD if SCO lose [LWN.net]

MS gain FUD if SCO lose

Posted May 20, 2003 14:35 UTC (Tue) by allesfresser (subscriber, #216)
In reply to: MS gain FUD if SCO lose by fergal
Parent article: The fear war against Linux (News.com)

Well, that's exactly what the GPL is for... to prevent "intellectual property" from becoming the smokescreen by which moneygrubbers keep people in the dark and charge them dearly for it. If MS has a tantrum, it's not our fault. Give them a time-out. A long one. Without supper. ;-)

to post comments

MS gain FUD if SCO lose

Posted May 20, 2003 14:48 UTC (Tue) by rknop (guest, #66) [Link] (4 responses)

While I fully agree with your sentiments, unfortunately most of the world doesn't.

In fact, most of the world-- or at least most of this country (USA)-- doens't have a clue about the issues. If anything, they think "intellectual property means protecting the rights of creators and is good for business and therefore is good for the economy so therefore we have to protect it", mostly because that's the line they've been fed by the media and by various politicians who get a lot of campaign donations from the media.

There's already a House caucus on "strengthening" intellectual property (which in my view needs strengthening about as much as anti-communistic activities needed strengthening back in the McCarthy years). The leader of that has said bad things about the GPL in the past.

It's not very much of a stretch to envision a world where the GPL becomes effectively outlawed by future copyright law in the USA, if the GPL is what makes SCO lose this case. MS and a lot of other powerful lobbyists would love to "strengthen" intellectual property law in this way (since after all cross-licencing and proprietary software is the fertile ground on which the technological marvels of today grew, or so we are supposed to believe), and most of the world has no clue how much this strengthening is going to cost them. We already have truly insane laws like the DMCA and (in some states) the super-DMCA, and the CPDTPA has been taken seriously. If you think insane legislation won't pass, you aren't paying attention. Sure, the courts *should* throw out any anti-GPL copyright laws, but will they? I wouldn't count on it. If MS and others can make a case that sounds good to Congress and to the common man that, however specious, says "the GPL is destroying intellectual property and therefore American business", you'd better believe that various congresscritters and presidents are going to line up to "do something about this danger to our country".

-Rob

MS gain FUD if SCO lose

Posted May 20, 2003 15:06 UTC (Tue) by allesfresser (subscriber, #216) [Link] (3 responses)

Well, yes, all that is true... but then I guess the USA will just keep sliding farther behind the rest of the world in technology, won't it? Do you think the hackers in India, Brazil, et. al. particularly want the USA to be always in front? I daresay they (we?) wouldn't mind if the jingoists got humbled once in a while. If MS wants to squander the US technology industry and give it away for the sake of more money for them, then I guess the rest of the world will gladly take the lead (and the future).

MS gain FUD if SCO lose

Posted May 20, 2003 18:18 UTC (Tue) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767) [Link]

As an American, I hope you're right. Meanwhile, we're too busy driving around in SUV's with American flags flying off of them (and pictures of bald eagles on the windows) to worry about such things.

MS gain FUD if SCO lose

Posted May 20, 2003 20:42 UTC (Tue) by bcw1000 (guest, #11345) [Link] (1 responses)

Maybe. Our PM, Helen Clark, is working hard to get Free Trade agreements with the US - many countries are. This often requires dependent agreements on legal issues.

So, the legal climate in the US can strongly influence other countries via the markets. The market decides, and if the strongest market is the US...

I don't like it, but smaller, poorer countries don't have much to sell to each other to rely on without the "US centric" global economy.

MS gain FUD if SCO lose

Posted May 22, 2003 14:13 UTC (Thu) by xoddam (subscriber, #2322) [Link]

Tragic, innit?

The strange thing is, by being the world's trade clearing-house and having all commodities denominated in dollars, the USA is actually utterly dependent on the rest of the world. If only we were to trade in something else (euros, or gold), America would be humbled.

I got a spam advertising septic tank equipment the other day... I thought it was a joke email from Australia. But no, it was an American spam, advertising septic tank equipment.

Jonathan

MS gain FUD if SCO lose

Posted May 20, 2003 15:06 UTC (Tue) by fergal (guest, #602) [Link] (3 responses)

You miss my point, I'm not talking about an MS tantrum, I'm talking about giving MS ammo to badmouth the GPL. They will say "look at SCO, they lost everything because of the evil, IP destroying GPL. We tried to warn you all to stay clear of it but you didn't listen. So line up over here for your perfectly safe copies of Win XP". As usual this will be lies but in a media war where the truth requires more than 30 seconds to understand and where most of the journalists have already been bought and payed for, truth and lies aren't very relevant.

Two possible ways to argue the case are:

1 - look at the code and prove no code was stolen

2 - we're not even going to look at the code because you released it yourselves under the GPL so even if it was stolen, you gave it to us - haha

If #2 is what wins the case then MS will have a field day telling everybody about the "dangers" of the GPL and opensource. So lets hope we win with #1 instead.

MS gain FUD if SCO lose

Posted May 20, 2003 16:09 UTC (Tue) by allesfresser (subscriber, #216) [Link]

Yes, it's always better to win honestly (with no "stolen" code) and yes, the GPL wasn't designed to trap people with. (How ironic that MS would try to use the spin that way...) But actually, MS is right in a way... the GPL *was* initially designed to destroy their particular style of "intellectual property"--because they want to distort and twist the laws to their own profit by locking things up behind lawyers rather than making inventions and concepts open for all to use. That is exactly what RMS was trying to prevent by making the GPL--it is deliberately and inherently in conflict with their mindset and way of doing things. So I'm not surprised at all that they don't like it--one doesn't usually like a tack placed on one's chair. The problem for us is that we have to live (at least for now) in a situation where MS can make things unpleasant for those that dare to fall out of line in the sheep pen. And since (as you pointed out) the cards are mostly stacked against us in regards to the press and the US government, it may be very unpleasant for a while. But then again, any war is unpleasant. I myself keep going in this cause because I want my children to be able to have the freedom I grew up with before the greedsters got their hands in everything. Didn't a certain Mr. Jefferson once write, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."? Nothing great is achieved without struggle, and this seems to be such a time.

MS gain FUD if SCO lose

Posted May 20, 2003 19:54 UTC (Tue) by abclements (guest, #11343) [Link]

Maybe the OpenSouce Community should use MS tatics. Something in the vain of-

Propietary software is bad because it produces incompatiblities...just look at quicktime, realplayer, media player.

Oh wait, that would be the TRUTH. :-)

MS gain FUD if SCO lose

Posted May 21, 2003 15:44 UTC (Wed) by proski (guest, #104) [Link]

Note that most companies are more likely to benefit if #2 wins. Many companies take software under GPL and use it internally. They would be affected if another company sues them for the use of the "stolen" code.

Very few companies would ever be releasing software under the GPL without knowing what they are releasing. And for those who do, WYGIWYD - what you get is what you deserve.