|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Ballmer on Linux (Register)

Ballmer on Linux (Register)

Posted May 16, 2003 14:57 UTC (Fri) by ncm (guest, #165)
Parent article: Ballmer on Linux (Register)

Two observations.

First, we see the first example of these supposedly "rational arguments" in the "Ten Linux Myths [Quibbled Over]" http://lwn.net/Articles/30237/ press release from Microsoft mouthpiece Gartner. Of course these are not rational arguments in the classical sense; but they are sophistical arguments meant to mislead and subtly confuse even as they appear to appeal to rationality. This is a major step for MS, and they have hired someone good at it.

Second, Ballmer says MS has "absolutely no plans to port any of its substantial software library to Linux." When a company starts making public statements like this, expect a port within a year. This will not be a good thing for Free Software, and we'd better be prepared.

Why will it not be a good thing? I'm sure you can think of lots of other reasons, but how about this one: viruses and worms.


to post comments

Ballmer on Linux (Register)

Posted May 17, 2003 17:51 UTC (Sat) by dsime (guest, #5764) [Link]


I disagree.
If MS ports Office, or other software, to Linux it will be great!

I won't use that crap, but it will allow people to move to Linux and keep the crap apps that they are accustomed to.
Then it will be easy to move to better apps on a piecemeal basis.

The only way for MS to continue is by being monolithic.

Dams with large cracks in them don't hold back flood waters.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds