|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

ordered(tm) brand

ordered(tm) brand

Posted Mar 16, 2009 21:29 UTC (Mon) by njs (subscriber, #40338)
In reply to: ordered(tm) brand by nye
Parent article: Garrett: ext4, application expectations and power management

Yeah, Ted's speaking filesystemdeveloperese there, but if you read other comments about the difference between ext3 and ext4 there's enough context to decipher. What he's basically saying is that at rename time they will now force the kernel to *decide* which disk blocks the data will eventually end up on (that's what "allocation" means), and then it's a pre-existing rule that before the metadata transaction commits (i.e., that's when the rename will hit disk) you have to write out all "allocated" blocks to disk.

So your interpretation is correct.


to post comments


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds