|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Semantic is NOT the same

Semantic is NOT the same

Posted Mar 15, 2009 20:56 UTC (Sun) by khim (subscriber, #9252)
In reply to: ordered(tm) brand by nybble41
Parent article: Garrett: ext4, application expectations and power management

From user POV semantic is wildly different: with Ext3 I'm guaranteed my P2P state will not be corrupt - no five seconds window. With Ext4 I'm almost guranteed it'll be destroyed in crash. Big difference.

Granted - it looked like "more-or-less" the same mode from filesystem developer POV, but that's no excuse... May be it's accident, may be not - but semantic of ext3 and ext4 ordered case was quite different...


to post comments


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds