|From:||"Eric S. Raymond" <esr-AT-thyrsus.com>|
|Subject:||Scripting in the longer term (was: Re: possible security problems)|
|Date:||Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:18:56 -0500|
allefant <email@example.com>: > Yes, any possible future AI or scripting additions should be discussed > on the forum of course. Just was trying to clarify why I think the > PythonAI failed - just generally blaming "Python" would be a bit > simple-minded and not help prevent similar problems in the future. > Ivanovic mentioned work on Lua scripting in the initial post of the > thread - so my impression was this already is or will soon be > available in SVN, I wouldn't really have suggested it otherwise :) As much as I like Python, I'm almost completely convinced now that lua is a better path in the long term - and when I say "almost completely", I mean "unless there's a large un-obvious fuck-up in the lua design or implementation". There are three application domains in play here: (1) AI plugins in a scrioting language (2) WML extension in a scripting language (3) Replacing Wesnoth core code in a scripting language lua looks like a winner in two of these areas: (1) because it can actually sandbox cleanly, (2) because we've already got a candidate patch that looks promising. It also looks pretty plausible to me for (3) because lua's native extension facilities luabind appear to be easier and more powerful than Python's - and that's a strong statement, because I know Python's embedding features and they're pretty good. By contrast, Python has a known sandboxing problem blocking (1) pretty hard, there's not even a blue-sky plan for (2). Take this seriously, because it's the project's biggest fan of Python talking. I'll continue to use Python for out-of-core tools and like it, but...I'm gonna learn lua. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
Copyright © 2009, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds