Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)
Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)
Posted May 8, 2003 0:59 UTC (Thu) by alan (subscriber, #4018)In reply to: Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer) by elanthis
Parent article: Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)
hrrm,. samba client and server I thought. smbfs has nothing to do with the on disk filesystem. I'm simply noting that they compared fileserving performance. I am less interested than the previous poster was about the ondisk filesystem format because using the kernel smbfs support would enhance fileserving performance,. which is what was actually being compared.