Re: Yet more ARM breakage in linux-next
[Posted December 10, 2008 by corbet]
| From: |
| Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org> |
| To: |
| Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-AT-oracle.com> |
| Subject: |
| Re: Yet more ARM breakage in linux-next |
| Date: |
| Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:46:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20081203154629.bba4e5e4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
| Cc: |
| rusty-AT-rustcorp.com.au, rmk+lkml-AT-arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, sfr-AT-canb.auug.org.au |
| Archive‑link: | |
Article |
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:37:44 -0800
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> > (Yes, classic useless kerneldoc documentation doesn't actually *say*
> > this clearly).
>
> oh fud. That's not a fault of kernel-doc, just of whoever wrote it.
> It's only as good as someone makes it.
For some reason, the act of typing in some kerneldoc makes people's
brains turn off. Perhaps it's because "oh, I am supposed to type some
documentation here" instead of "gee, I think this code is unclear,
let's clarify that".
