Squashfs submitted for the mainline
Posted Oct 30, 2008 10:02 UTC (Thu) by dlang (subscriber, #313)
Posted Oct 30, 2008 11:43 UTC (Thu) by Tuxie (guest, #47191)
Posted Oct 30, 2008 11:59 UTC (Thu) by epa (subscriber, #39769)
Posted Oct 30, 2008 13:22 UTC (Thu) by ajb (subscriber, #9694)
Admittedly that might be considered an expensive solution, but it proves that a solution exists.
Posted Oct 30, 2008 13:42 UTC (Thu) by Tuxie (guest, #47191)
It also say: "the amount of RAM required during decompression is principally determined by the size of the sliding window used during compression. Small code size and relatively low memory overhead, particularly with smaller dictionary lengths, make the LZMA decompression algorithm well-suited to embedded applications."
I'm not sure if that's a good enough answer. :)
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds