User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

I'm no hardware nut, but..

I'm no hardware nut, but..

Posted Oct 2, 2008 3:51 UTC (Thu) by mbligh (subscriber, #7720)
In reply to: I'm no hardware nut, but.. by dw
Parent article: Low-level tracing plumbing

> It seems to me that the struct is better optimised for size than it is
> performance.

Yes. We want to pack as much data into the buffer as possible

> struct { uint32_t; uint32_t; uint32_t; }

That takes 3 times as much space! You're roughly having the amount of useful
data we can store in the trace buffer.

> struct { uint8_t; uint8_t; uint16_t; }

That doesn't leave enough space for the time counter. It's TSC stamping at roughly 2-4GHz, and we need accurate resolution to merge the per-cpu buffers back together. We don't want to log extended timestamp events (whenever your time counter rolls over) too often.


(Log in to post comments)


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds