|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Udev rules and the management of the plumbing layer

Udev rules and the management of the plumbing layer

Posted Aug 14, 2008 21:46 UTC (Thu) by stuart (subscriber, #623)
Parent article: Udev rules and the management of the plumbing layer

The thing I find strange is that there is any kind of stand-off at all.

Greg K-H and Kay Sievers can preempt Marco's comments by going here:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/udev

Download the diff.gz, applies it to the orig (or upstream tar ball) and see what Marco's rules
are and if they are indeed better.

If we look at it from Marco's (or more generally any Debian maintainer's) point-of-view, he's
already posted his patch in one of the most accessible ways possible: to the web for upstream
to take notice of. Many upstreams do take notice and merge stuff back.

I can already see Greg / Kay's point-of-view from the article, but seriously, I don't
understand the reluctance to examine and, if appropriate, rebut Marco's comments based on
examining his rulesets.


to post comments

Udev rules and the management of the plumbing layer

Posted Aug 15, 2008 1:43 UTC (Fri) by mbiebl (subscriber, #41876) [Link]

afaik, the debian rules were directly available in the upstream git repository but deleted a
few days ago:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commit;...

Udev rules and the management of the plumbing layer

Posted Aug 25, 2008 19:04 UTC (Mon) by renox (guest, #23785) [Link]

You should realize that this mindset created the Debian's ssl fiasco..

It's really up to downstream developers to send patches upstream giving explanation for the requested change not the other way round (there's hundred of distribution to monitors!).

So this is a process issue, not a technical issue.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds