Re: default udev rules
[Posted August 12, 2008 by corbet]
| From: |
| md-AT-Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) |
| To: |
| unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) |
| Subject: |
| Re: default udev rules |
| Date: |
| Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:45:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20080811164521.GA12621@bongo.bofh.it> |
| Cc: |
| linux-hotplug <linux-hotplug-AT-vger.kernel.org> |
On Aug 11, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
> There is not really a need for a compromise, we asked you to send a
> patch to add that "elegance", and we will change the default rules
Tell me what's missing from my rules instead, I will fix it and then you
will be able to use them. If nothing is missing, then you can replace
the files right now.
BTW: *I* documented the semantics of the Debian rules files. From
README.Debian:
Since the order may be important, files have a specific name which
must be considered when adding custom rules. So far have been defined:
- 50: the default names are set.
- 60: path_id and the other *_id programs are run. persistent links
are created.
- 70: network interfaces are renamed and generated rules for persistent
links are processed.
- 75: the rules generators are run if needed.
- 80: drivers are loaded.
- 91: the default permissions and owners are set.
- 95: $REMOVE_CMD is run, and then processing of tty devices
is stopped with last_rule.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html