"Scanning for exploits is always going to be a lost cause - viz windows security and the ineffectiveness of the whole anti-malware industry." Well, its effectiveness doesn't matter really. What matters is that it makes money. Lots of it. And the truth is that 99% of the World is just gullible and insists on thinking that security holes are handled by scanning for viruses/malware and not by patching holes. You may even call it a conspiracy theory, but the fact is that there is a many-billion dollar industry behind AV/Malware scanning that probably feels that its core business is threatened by the emergence of alternative free and open systems. These people have no interest on secure operating systems, since those represent a major loss of revenue. The way I see it, those patches the article talks about (which seem rather more like a solution in search of a problem), may be just the effects of the AV industry lobbying some Linux vendors just to try to convince end users that they need to pay for AV/Malware scanning, just like Windows users, so that money keeps flowing...
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds