I love how a paragraph begins with: "It is rather easy to make sweeping statements..." Then ends with: "...part of a fairly pervasive perception that Ubuntu and Canonical are not contributing very much back to the community." The article does a decent job of illustrating how Ubuntu does not contribute to the kernel, but to say Ubuntu doesn't contribute much to the community is not fair. The kernel is only one part of the puzzle, a part that already has plenty of attention. Say what you want about Ubuntu (I don't use it), but the fact is they pay people to contribute to free software. They distribute a decent distribution on a regular schedule and support it without cost. They have a thriving community. Etc. There may be many downsides to the arrival of Shuttleworth / Ubuntu / Canonical, but on the whole I think what they've brought to the table far outweighs them. Therefore, I thank them for their effort. Of course they can improve, and I hope they do. But even if they don't - I'll never be part of this "fairly pervasive" perception that they don't contribute.
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds