Interview: Wind River's John Bruggeman
Interview: Wind River's John Bruggeman
Posted Jul 22, 2008 5:39 UTC (Tue) by jordanb (guest, #45668)In reply to: Interview: Wind River's John Bruggeman by smitty_one_each
Parent article: Interview: Wind River's John Bruggeman
I suspect it's more a matter of the process to get the software certified being complex, rather than the standards themselves. For real high-integrity software, I think it would be very difficult to get Linux certified. A big part of it is a verification of the development process, and you'd have an incredibly hard time showing that Linux went through any sort of rigor (mainly because it didn't ;p). You would probably have to take a snapshot of the kernel, rip out everything that isn't needed, and then do code review and testing in-house, replacing or removing things that fail review or don't conform to MISRA-C. By the time that's done whatever benefit there was to using Linux over an in-house OS would likely be gone. Does the process serve to inflate the profits of a company like Wind River? Probably, but then again, Aerospace has a culture of safety that doesn't exist in most other areas where software is developed and used. The fact that Avionics have been remarkably free of people-killing bugs is a pretty good validation of the process.
