User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Don't think so

Don't think so

Posted Jul 18, 2008 1:37 UTC (Fri) by tialaramex (subscriber, #21167)
In reply to: Kernel security problems: a response by k3ninho
Parent article: Kernel security problems: a response

No, there's no spelling error or other typographical problem. I think you're parsing the
sentence wrong.

"bugs which are somehow not so designated" are the subject of the phrase, and the claim is
that they would be marginalised as "not worth fixing".

This claim is true as written.


(Log in to post comments)

Don't think so

Posted Jul 23, 2008 3:48 UTC (Wed) by roelofs (guest, #2599) [Link]

No, there's no spelling error or other typographical problem. I think you're parsing the sentence wrong.

The sentence can be parsed correctly, but I would claim that it's not properly written. It should instead read as follows:

To try to do so marginalizes bugs which are not so designated as somehow not worth fixing.

...i.e., move "somehow" to the second "not". That is, bugs are either so designated or not; there's no ambiguity there. It's the "worth fixing" part that's a fuzzier judgment call ("somehow").

Greg


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds