> The question was really about whether Ubuntu was so committed to GNOME > that it would be implicated in any such problems Well, that's actually a very good and interesting question. But I'll have to say that, for me, the question came not across with that semantic. So you might have a communication problem in your article. :-) Concerning your 1st paragraph: For risk assessment of patent dangers, it is not relevant why a technology is cloned. That it is cloned is all that matters. FTR, I actually think that patent attacks against both technologies don't have any practical chance to arrive, it's more fudder for FUD than for actual law suits. My reasons for this opinion are neither legal nor technological, but from a business viewpoint. Patent attacks just don't make business sense for MS, but patent FUD does. And we in the OSS community should not increase the FUD that emanates from MS, IMHO. But then, I live in one of those jurisdictions where software patents are (still) not allowed, so maybe I can be more relaxed than others on the American side of the pond.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds