Where 2.6.25 came from
Where 2.6.25 came from
Posted Apr 6, 2008 10:28 UTC (Sun) by bunk (subscriber, #44933)In reply to: Where 2.6.25 came from by lacostej
Parent article: Where 2.6.25 came from
You said: From my readings of the graph the last 2 kernels have very steep merge. 2.6.19 started merging late 2.6.22 has had more late merges than its successors 2.6.20 seems to have stabilized early Don't believe any statistics you haven't faked yourself. There is no strong relation between the number of changes and the number of lines changed. And none of them has any strong relation to when a kernel stabilizes. An increase in the "count of lines changed over time" graph can e.g. be one or more of the following: * many bugfixes * defconfig updates * addition or removal of drivers It's a nice graph, but when you ignore the fact that it contains zero information *why* lines changed all conclusions you draw are invalid.
The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:
Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.
