Upgrading? Re-installing
Upgrading? Re-installing
Posted Mar 26, 2008 17:17 UTC (Wed) by tialaramex (subscriber, #21167)In reply to: Ubuntu 6.10 reaches end-of-life on April 26, 2008 by muwlgr
Parent article: Ubuntu 6.10 reaches end-of-life on April 26, 2008
Yes, it left me a bit alarmed actually at first when I saw it described. But it appears that what they're talking about as an "upgrade" actually flushes everything on the system, and this is a feature which changes that to optionally not destroy /home. So it's not like an ordinary operating system upgrade at all, it seems like it would be more useful for "sidegrades", throwing away the OS but keeping the data. I don't know if that means Ubuntu doesn't provide a mechanism for routine "same OS, newer version" upgrades, or just some users don't like the potential for build-up of "cruft" (e.g. after five years of Red Hat upgrades I had some obsolete binaries in /usr/bin/ that were so old my kernel wouldn't run them, but the package manager had never actually deleted them) Personally I've been very happy with upgrades of Red Hat and Fedora on multiple systems over the years. They haven't always worked smoothly, but they were definitely less painful than re-installing everything.
The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:
Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.
