Security

Home routers and security flaws

A message to Bugtraq about vulnerabilities in the British Telecom (BT) Home Hub this week had a familiar ring to it. We covered a cautionary posting about these kinds of problems in May, now we have a report of easily exploited flaws in a home router that is widely deployed in the UK. Unfortunately, we will probably have to cover the problem again, as these devices are becoming ubiquitous, while the manufacturers and distributors are, seemingly, leaving the security testing to their users.

The Home Hub is a standard Thompson/Alcatel DSL router, branded and distributed by BT, that provides VoIP and digital television in addition to internet access. It also has Wi-Fi connectivity which can provide shared access to the neighborhood via the Fon network. Overall, it sounds like a nice device, providing multiple useful features, but it evidently can be completely taken over ("owned") rather easily.

The exact details of the exploits used are not revealed, but the video linked from the discoverer's website shows web access to the router's administration screen after luring the victim into following a malicious link. The description of the flaws found read like a laundry list of web application flaws: cross-site scripting, cross-site request forgery, and authentication bypass. Though the router runs Linux, presumably the flaws are specific to the application software or configuration of the router; at least no more widespread vulnerability was reported.

Full access to the router configuration allows for a mind-boggling number of malicious uses. As is pointed out in the posting, one could steal VoIP credentials, reroute VoIP calls for eavesdropping, steal the WEP keys, change the DNS to point to a server under the attacker's control in order to steal credentials, etc. Most of these would be completely undetectable in normal use and the owner might go a long time before noticing that the settings had changed – if they can even log in anymore.

According to the website, BT has responded and is investigating the flaws, presumably some kind of update will be forthcoming. Home routers are particularly sensitive targets, precisely because of the undetectable nature of the attack. If the attacker is careful enough not to interrupt normal functioning, the owner will have no reason to check the configuration.

These kinds of problems are not restricted to routers or embedded networking devices, of course, but they do make tempting targets. Because of that, and the difficulty of ensuring that all customers get a critical security update, vendors of these products and the internet providers that push them need to test very carefully. Someone other than the developers should be tasked with strenuous penetration testing on a device like this, before it gets in the hands of customers.

Updating the devices in the field pose a number of problems; the obvious solution is to do it automatically, without customer intervention. But, as iPhone unlockers recently found out, that can lead to unwanted "upgrades". It is an uneasy balancing act – customers will need to trust the device providers to only update for bugs or security holes, while the providers will need to earn that trust by not breaking functionality the customer relies upon. Otherwise, folks will figure out ways to disable the auto-update functionality, completely defeating the purpose.

This particular incident seems not to exploit any particular Linux problem, but we might not be so lucky the next time. It would be a tragedy to see Linux linked with an in-the-wild exploit of a vulnerable device. An unknown exploit (a so-called "zero day") would be bad enough, but a known kernel bug that did not get properly updated would be a far worse black eye.

Comments (7 posted)

Gathering 'Storm' Superworm Poses Grave Threat to PC Nets (Wired)

Comments (none posted)

debian-goodies: privilege escalation

Comments (none posted)

gforge: cross-site scripting

Comments (none posted)

imagemagick: multiple vulnerabilities

Comments (none posted)

opal: denial of service

Comments (none posted)

pwlib: denial of service

Comments (none posted)

ruby: insufficient SSL certificate validation

Comments (none posted)

tk: arbitrary code execution via malformed GIF

Comments (1 posted)

util-linux: privilege escalation

Comments (none posted)

x11: xfs font server overflows

Comments (none posted)

xen: privilege escalation

Comments (1 posted)