User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Reviving linux-tiny

Reviving linux-tiny

Posted Sep 27, 2007 8:37 UTC (Thu) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263)
In reply to: Reviving linux-tiny by felixfix
Parent article: Reviving linux-tiny

That is horrible. You already end up often enough in Windows with messages like "Error 1026" and dunno wtf it means without doing lengthy searches on MSDN.


(Log in to post comments)

Reviving linux-tiny

Posted Sep 27, 2007 9:01 UTC (Thu) by filipjoelsson (guest, #2622) [Link]

So put a translator in userland!

Let "make install" put a printk.map-2.6.24 in /boot for vmlinuz-2.6.24 - and syslog/dmesg could grab the relevant message and make the switch. For embedded systems you could trim the lower levels of interest, zip the file, or whatever. You should get the error code only if the relevant string isn't found - and that should happen only if you have actively chosen to trim that class of printks (or printks alltogether - but in that case, and error code would be an improvent on no-message-at-all, right?).

This leaves the problem of getting the message out in case of a kernel panic - so maybe a subset of strings still need to reside in the kernel. But I don't believe all of it is needed there.

I agree we don't need messages like "Error 1026" and lengthy MSDN searches to uncover that it means "Memory corruption" - but bloating the RAM with error strings isn't the only alternative.

Seriously, I know putting too much stuff in userland is frowned upon - but putting error translation there looks way better than putting filesystems in userland.

Reviving linux-tiny

Posted Sep 27, 2007 13:34 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

And when userspace is dead, or if the machine dies before the necessary daemon is running, now the poor damn users are just hit with gibberish error codes again... just when natural-language messages might help them climb out of the mire.

(Also, what about the printf()-style format substitutions printk() allows? An error ID scheme provides no space for that at all. There's a reason the old catgets scheme is unused except by masochists.)

Reviving linux-tiny

Posted Sep 27, 2007 9:11 UTC (Thu) by james (subscriber, #1325) [Link]

On the other hand, truly unique error numbers (especially if they are all printed as LINUX44353, for example) are easy to Google...

Error message numbers...

Posted Oct 3, 2007 16:00 UTC (Wed) by hummassa (subscriber, #307) [Link]

are the salvation for anyone who has ever used Oracle. If you don't understand the short message, you just google for ORA.01234 or whatnot and voila -- tonnes of info about what, where and how the error often occurs.

Error message numbers...

Posted Oct 3, 2007 16:07 UTC (Wed) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263) [Link]

Well too bad if your only machine's network card driver quit its job.

Error message numbers...

Posted Oct 3, 2007 16:25 UTC (Wed) by felixfix (subscriber, #242) [Link]

Also too bad if you can't read the comment that suggests it be a compile time option, so only those who want to save the memory need enable it.

Error message numbers...

Posted Oct 3, 2007 19:08 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

Speaking as someone who uses Oracle every day, they're bloody awful. Oh
look, I got an ORA-xxyy complaining about some column in a big query.
Which column? Oh, look, even though the RDBMS knows it refuses to tell me
because there's no way to fit that into its precious bloody message
number.

And so on.

I'd say that 25% of my error-message-revealed bug-fixing time is spent
figuring out just what the hell the system is actually trying to tell me,
entirely because of this problem.

[ot] sqlplus or oracle developer

Posted Oct 22, 2007 23:32 UTC (Mon) by hummassa (subscriber, #307) [Link]

use one of sqlplus or oracle developer to repeat your query, they usually 
mark the right spot where the error ocurred.

[ot] sqlplus or oracle developer

Posted Oct 23, 2007 13:09 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

Very amusing, well done.

(they always mark *a* spot, often an entirely different one. I don't 
castigate them for this: parser error recovery is notoriously difficult. 
But the numbered-error-messages thing just makes everything so much harder 
than it should be...)

So change your config

Posted Sep 27, 2007 14:32 UTC (Thu) by felixfix (subscriber, #242) [Link]

If it's a config item, you can choose the bulky kernel with complete messages or the slim kernel with just numbers.

Reviving linux-tiny

Posted Sep 28, 2007 22:02 UTC (Fri) by nlucas (subscriber, #33793) [Link]

So, because Windows do it (even if it is in no way any innovation at all), Linux can't.

I'm still waiting for someone to come up with a better idea.

A message in a foreign language you don't know (remember the majority of the world population doesn't speak English) doesn't seem to me the brightest idea around.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds