Relicensing: what's legal and what's right
Relicensing: what's legal and what's right
Posted Sep 5, 2007 22:14 UTC (Wed) by bojan (subscriber, #14302)In reply to: Relicensing: what's legal and what's right by dtucker
Parent article: Relicensing: what's legal and what's right
Yeah, nice try, but not quite :-)
The goal of the GPL (any version) is to preserve software freedoms, as defined here:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
I'm not going to go into "which is better" here, but it is clear to anyone that by licensing under a permissive licence, some of the freedoms can vanish in due course of (binary-only) redistribution. In other words, they are not guaranteed to be preserved using such a licence. Hence the GPL.
