|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Relicensing: what's legal and what's right

Relicensing: what's legal and what's right

Posted Sep 5, 2007 22:14 UTC (Wed) by bojan (subscriber, #14302)
In reply to: Relicensing: what's legal and what's right by dtucker
Parent article: Relicensing: what's legal and what's right

Yeah, nice try, but not quite :-)

The goal of the GPL (any version) is to preserve software freedoms, as defined here:

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

I'm not going to go into "which is better" here, but it is clear to anyone that by licensing under a permissive licence, some of the freedoms can vanish in due course of (binary-only) redistribution. In other words, they are not guaranteed to be preserved using such a licence. Hence the GPL.


to post comments


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds