i just wondered exactly how clueless that canon guy quoted in the times online article is...
"Every image that is taken on a digital camera contains Exif data, which holds information about the picture such as zoom, contrast, focus and 'distance to subject' measurements. It is typically used for 'trouble-shooting', so an owner can ascertain why a picture may not have worked, but it also enables a court, for instance, to establish whether a picture has been digitally altered. 'The Exif data is like the picture's DNA; you can't switch it off. Every image has it. Some software can be used to strip or edit the information, but you can't edit every field,' Mr Solomon said."
afaik, there is no cryptographic hash involved in exif data, right? and even if it were, tamper-evidence would require a private vendor key in the camera which is certainly easy to extract and fake... so are these people really propagating the assumption that people will not be able to edit a couple of more-or-less plaintext fields?
reminds me of our innenminister's latest coup: the online search warrant that basically enables the feds to place a trojan on my computer. strikes me as profiling: we only go after those people too stupid to take simple and obvious countermeasures... i knew these linux users have something to hide....
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds