Microsoft "Rights Management Service"
| From: | Charles Cazabon <web-regletters@discworld.dyndns.org> | |
| To: | john.leyden@theregister.co.uk | |
| Subject: | Microsoft "Rights Management Service" | |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:16:15 -0600 | |
| Cc: | letters@lwn.net |
Greetings, Mr. Leyden, I read your recent article "Microsoft devs Windows Rights Management Services" with great interest. Microsoft has finally tipped its hat as to when it will start making sure that their software does what they (or their "partners") want it to, instead of what the user (i.e. you) want it to do. But the ultimate irony is in the name: programs designed to remove the right of the user to copy or excerpt from a "protected text" (i.e. a fair-use right), going by the acronym of "RMS"? There isn't a less-appropriate three-letter acronym possible. Was this a deliberate slap at the Free Software Foundation and its founder, Richard M. Stallman, commonly known as "rms"? Charles Cazabon -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <web-regletters@discworld.dyndns.org> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted Feb 27, 2003 19:55 UTC (Thu)
by dbreakey (guest, #1381)
[Link]
Probably not, as that would imply a certain level of native cleverness on their part; however, it's certainly not impossible.
Microsoft "Rights Management Service"
