User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

KHB: Real-world disk failure rates: surprises, surprises, and more surprises

KHB: Real-world disk failure rates: surprises, surprises, and more surprises

Posted Jun 14, 2007 7:03 UTC (Thu) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
In reply to: KHB: Real-world disk failure rates: surprises, surprises, and more surprises by pr1268
Parent article: KHB: Real-world disk failure rates: surprises, surprises, and more surprises

Er, you listen to salespeople at Fry's??

I've only ever managed clusters of disks numbered in the few tens. Overall I find that hard disks are surprisingly reliable. I think most disks fall out of rotation because of a lack of capacity, not because they break. (I still remember how thrilled I was when they fit 20 GB of data in a 3.5" package... today I can fit 50 of those drives into a single 3.5" package!)

One lesson that I've learned is that manufacturer loyalty is pretty much meaningless. I had an early batch of Quantum 15G drives that were so stone-cold reliable I'm sure they would still be working today. However, Quantum Fireballs would reliably die after two years. I remember Maxtor producing utter crap in the past but I have a set of their 60GB drives still spinning. Seagate used to be fairly mediocre and now they're top notch across the board. When deciding what drive to buy, go to Storage Review and read about the individual models; brand is meaningless.

I also find that motherboard failures (i.e. CPU or memory socket corrosion, weak power supply, etc) tends to destroy the drive as well. I read the Google paper back in Feb and I don't remember them taking this into account... It would be nice to know what portion of failures were drive-only, and what portion was chaotic damage that just happened to include the drive as well.


(Log in to post comments)

KHB: Real-world disk failure rates: surprises, surprises, and more surprises

Posted Jun 15, 2007 0:51 UTC (Fri) by pr1268 (subscriber, #24648) [Link]

> Er, you listen to salespeople at Fry's??

I listen to them, but I don't always believe everything they say. But, again, my Seagate discussion was more tuned into the idea that their warranty (which they proudly advertise in big print on the sides of the box) is much longer than those of most other name-brand hard disk manufacturers (which is often hidden in the fine print). I agree, brand loyalty doesn't mean much these days, and besides, I used to think WDC (Western Digital) drives were the finest-quality consumer hard disks. Nowadays I don't think WDC drives are nearly as good as they were 5-10 years ago, and I've never had any good experiences with Maxtor. Times change, and so do hard drive manufacturers' quality control (and standards).

Maybe in 5-10 years I'll think the same about Maxtor, WDC, or Fujitsu as I do now about Seagate...


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds