Microsoft/Novell agreement posted Posted May 26, 2007 22:07 UTC (Sat) by NightMonkey (subscriber, #23051) [Link] Of course, these are not the FULL agreements, as there are components that have been redacted for "confidentiality". Microsoft/Novell agreement posted Posted May 27, 2007 9:57 UTC (Sun) by hansl (subscriber, #5086) [Link] (1 responses) What I find interesting is that they exclude a number of 'clone poducts' from the patent agreement, whereby the definition of 'clone product' appears to be carefully worded to apply to Wine, OpenXchange, StarOffice and OpenOffice, but not Samba and Mono. Microsoft/Novell agreement posted Posted May 28, 2007 9:09 UTC (Mon) by jacno (subscriber, #15083) [Link] You may want to read wine weekly newsletter's point of view in issue 332 : http://www.winehq.org/?issue=332 Microsoft/Novell agreement posted Posted May 27, 2007 20:30 UTC (Sun) by dirtyepic (guest, #30178) [Link] *** Without limiting *** result of a *** under the *** then *** will at its *** that it *** do so on *** to make it *** it with a *** to make it *** Ah, it's all so clear now.
Posted May 26, 2007 22:07 UTC (Sat) by NightMonkey (subscriber, #23051) [Link]
Posted May 27, 2007 9:57 UTC (Sun) by hansl (subscriber, #5086) [Link] (1 responses)
Microsoft/Novell agreement posted Posted May 28, 2007 9:09 UTC (Mon) by jacno (subscriber, #15083) [Link] You may want to read wine weekly newsletter's point of view in issue 332 : http://www.winehq.org/?issue=332
Posted May 28, 2007 9:09 UTC (Mon) by jacno (subscriber, #15083) [Link]
Posted May 27, 2007 20:30 UTC (Sun) by dirtyepic (guest, #30178) [Link]
Copyright © 2007, Eklektix, Inc. Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
LWN