User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

The trouble with volatile

The trouble with volatile

Posted May 10, 2007 17:38 UTC (Thu) by PaulMcKenney (subscriber, #9624)
Parent article: The trouble with volatile

One other use for volatile is when communicating with interrupt/NMI handlers running on the same CPU. In this case, all the accesses are on the same CPU, so CPU reordering is irrelevant -- CPUs see their own accesses in order. The only requirement is that the compiler avoid optimizations that re-order the code.

Note that this applies only to hardware interrupts or NMIs -- this technique does not necessarily work for "interrupt handlers" that are passed off to threads.

So this is a specialized technique (especially in -rt), but an entirely valid one.


(Log in to post comments)


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds