User: Password:
Subscribe / Log in / New account

dealing with copyright infringement

dealing with copyright infringement

Posted Apr 12, 2007 16:54 UTC (Thu) by k8to (subscriber, #15413)
In reply to: dealing with copyright infringement by grouch
Parent article: How not to handle a licensing violation

Your tone seems to be equating the public notification of a problem with a measure of punishment. If this is an accurate description of the the intent, it would certainly be a mistake. I see no such indication.

(Log in to post comments)

dealing with copyright infringement

Posted Apr 12, 2007 17:13 UTC (Thu) by man_ls (guest, #15091) [Link]

I would say "insult" rather than "punishment", but both are related. I have to be a bit verbose to explain it, please be patient with me.

Private notification can be as quick as public notification, if the receiving party reacts promptly to it. Now, an honest, conscious developer would surely react to the private notification with the same swiftness as if she had the public eye on her. Therefore, believing that a public notification can get a swifter response than a private one is equivalent to thinking that the receiving developer is not honest or conscious; or at least that you do not trust said developer to make the right thing on her own. It is natural to feel insulted by such a thought.

The punishment comes if you really think that the developer has done a bad thing, and it is implied by such loaded words as "falsely labelled", "crime", "duped", etc. Then you have to punish the guilty developer, and since you cannot trust someone who did a bad thing you have to go for a public beating.

If you believe the code misuse is the result of an honest mistake, and that it will be prompty resolved, you ought to be much more inclined to try a private notification first.

dealing with copyright infringement

Posted Apr 12, 2007 17:23 UTC (Thu) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link]

For my part, "falsely labelled" was referring not to the action but the status of the code. That is, the code was in a barbed, dangerous state: that of being falsely labelled. The loading was to convey the danger, not any malfeasance.

Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds