User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

what nice means

what nice means

Posted Mar 17, 2007 2:59 UTC (Sat) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954)
In reply to: Xorg by k8to
Parent article: RSDL hits a snag

I've personally always been extremely murky on what nice is supposed to do on Unix. Sometimes it doesn't seem to do much at all.

The last time I investigated that was years ago, so who knows what nice is now, but assuming it's roughly the same: Nice is just a limit on the priority a process is allowed to have, as the scheduler adjusts it up and down according to its own policies. If the scheduler naturally comes to the same conclusion as you as to the needs of a process, your nice won't have an effect. You can watch priorities in 'top' (better: 'htop') and get an idea. For me, the big compile job I force to be nice is often pretty nice anyway just because the scheduler figures out it's a long running job.

And the priority value itself is no great thing: it's just how long the process is allowed to keep the CPU when it gets it. Even the highest priority process can wait a long time to get it.

My Amiga featured simplistic preemption, which was easy to grasp. The highest priorty task would run, priorities were fixed, and you could set them arbitrarily.

This is all just the dynamic priority scheme, i.e. scheduling among processes with absolute priority 0 (which is usually all of them). If you give a process absolute priority 1, it will always run before any of the processes with absolute priority 0; it can even preempt a process that already has it. (Absolute priorities are what people usually call realtime priority).


(Log in to post comments)


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds