User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Stupid question - that Linus anticipated

Stupid question - that Linus anticipated

Posted Feb 20, 2007 0:28 UTC (Tue) by mikov (subscriber, #33179)
In reply to: Stupid question - that Linus anticipated by ds2horner
Parent article: Alternatives to fibrils

How could it _not_ matter to callers ? If the thread id can change arbitrarily based on factors outside of the applications control - e.g. if some driver buffer is empty - then the thread id becomes completely pointless.

To me this seems completely unacceptable. Am I missing something ?


(Log in to post comments)

Stupid question - that Linus anticipated

Posted Feb 22, 2007 21:02 UTC (Thu) by huaz (guest, #10168) [Link]

You are right, it's indeed unacceptable.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds