> The DRM-clause in GPLv3 wouldn't forbid a feature like this (when the developer key is not distributed)?
The GPL is a promise to supply the source on demand, and the Bitfrost scheme involves promising to supply the developer key to each user on demand -- seems entirely reasonable to me.
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds