The cost of monoculture (Gen Kanai)
The cost of monoculture (Gen Kanai)
Posted Jan 29, 2007 17:00 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: The cost of monoculture (Gen Kanai) by drag
Parent article: The cost of monoculture (Gen Kanai)
And the DDR called itself 'democratic'. The name an organization gives itself does *not* necessarily indicate whether it actually conforms to those ideals (indeed in politics it is frequently an indication that it does not).
Posted Jan 29, 2007 21:29 UTC (Mon)
by drag (guest, #31333)
[Link] (1 responses)
So the Nazi party was definately a socialist party. But it's a strong 'Right Wing' one with paranonia towards non-germans and things like a strong pro-death penatly stance.
Modern European socialism is usually typified by a 'soft left' approach, which is certainly very different from what the nazis were.
Posted Feb 5, 2007 1:56 UTC (Mon)
by liljencrantz (guest, #28458)
[Link]
Both of these leanings can be found among some conservatives, sure, but they are very typical of communist states as well.
They were definately not marxist, they definately aren't the same as modern European style socialism, but they did have the idea of a strong central government regulating the economy and providing a welfare state, government ran education, and government ran healthcare system.The cost of monoculture (Gen Kanai)
In what way is "paranonia towards non-germans and things like a strong pro-death penatly stance" right wing?The cost of monoculture (Gen Kanai)