|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Text email clients revisited (Linux.com)

Text email clients revisited (Linux.com)

Posted Jan 4, 2007 19:24 UTC (Thu) by NAR (subscriber, #1313)
In reply to: Text email clients revisited (Linux.com) by b7j0c
Parent article: Text email clients revisited (Linux.com)

why do you not want to keep messages on the server?

Last time I've tried pine with Exchange, it was slow. The other reason why I keep my mail locally is that pine just can't filter like procmail does.

Bye,NAR


to post comments

Text email clients revisited (Linux.com)

Posted Jan 4, 2007 20:12 UTC (Thu) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link]

take a look at popfile, it can be used to filter mail on an IMAP server (manual filtering with it's 'magnets' as well as the bayesian filtering to any number of folders)

Text email clients revisited (Linux.com)

Posted Jan 4, 2007 20:17 UTC (Thu) by ms (subscriber, #41272) [Link]

Mutt with Cyrus is great. And server-side filtering in Cyrus with Sieve is both RFC'd and is about the only filtering system that I've worked with that has a better semantic understanding of email addresses in headers than the standard pattern matching of procmail or maildrop.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds