User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One

A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One

Posted Aug 24, 2006 11:42 UTC (Thu) by dark (guest, #8483)
In reply to: A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One by job
Parent article: A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One

"Nobody gives gigabytes of memory to each qmail-smtpd process" is a falsifiable statement. If it turns out to be false, will DJB pay out the $500?


(Log in to post comments)

A comparison of Mail Transfer Agents - Part One

Posted Sep 5, 2006 13:19 UTC (Tue) by job (guest, #670) [Link]

I think the problem has to be in the default configuration. DJB never
claimed that it was impossible to set up qmail insecurely if you really
wanted to. You can even use it as an open relay if you want.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds