|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Who maintains RPM?

Who maintains RPM?

Posted Aug 24, 2006 7:50 UTC (Thu) by lamikr (guest, #2289)
Parent article: Who maintains RPM?

Is there something technicallly advantageous in deb packages compared to rpm packages or other way around?

Like does either of these systems have superiour dependency handling tools for the package developers, or better syntax for handling those dependencies.

Or are these tools just offering about the same level of functionality while being incompatible with each others and requiring that the app packagers need to handle both of the syntaxes. In that case maybe it would go a good idea from fedora to jump also to jump to use debian packages by default. At least for the end users that could be a win in the long run.


to post comments

Who maintains RPM?

Posted Aug 24, 2006 8:24 UTC (Thu) by seyman (subscriber, #1172) [Link]

Is there something technicallly advantageous in deb packages compared to rpm packages or other way around?

Joey has a very complete page on the differences between dpkg and rpm

Note that rpm now handles recommendations and suggestions but Fedora and Suse aren't picking up the upstream version that does this.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds