|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

X.org, distributors, and proprietary modules

X.org, distributors, and proprietary modules

Posted Aug 15, 2006 17:36 UTC (Tue) by mrshiny (guest, #4266)
In reply to: X.org, distributors, and proprietary modules by vblum
Parent article: X.org, distributors, and proprietary modules

I agree with most of what you're saying, except that the following distinction should be made: Fedora Core 5 is already shipped, installed, and stable. There is no compelling reason to break user functionality. I don't think anyone is saying that Fedora should delay including xorg 7.1 in FC6 if the nVidia driver isn't ready. At that point it will be nVidia's fault that their driver doesn't support a popular distribution. But at this point, with FC5, it is Fedora that would be breaking my working system, or, at best, forcing me to A) find out that a particular update will break my system, and B) figure out how to back out that update, and/or prevent it from applying, thus potentially leaving me open to other dependencies breaking and security vulnerabilities.


to post comments

X.org, distributors, and proprietary modules

Posted Aug 15, 2006 19:54 UTC (Tue) by vblum (guest, #1151) [Link]

Point taken; although gentoo's default choice continues to puzzle me a bit. Anyway, may NVidia one day see the light from all this debate ...


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds